Epson Announces Settlements, Consent Orders and Default Judgments in the ITC Action Filed against 24 Aftermarket Cartridge Companies

– LONG BEACH, United States, November 27, 2006 –

Epson has entered settlement agreements in a patent infringement action pending with the U.S. International Trade Commission ("ITC") and similar lawsuits pending in the U.S. District Court in Portland, Ore., with five suppliers of aftermarket printer supplies and their related companies. Among the settling defendants are three major manufacturers of aftermarket printer supplies: Artech GMBH of Germany, Ink Lab Co. Ltd. of Hong Kong, and InkTec Co. Ltd. of Korea. Also settling are two major U.S. distributors of aftermarket printer supplies: Inc. of Canton, Conn., and Rhinotek Computer Products Inc. of Compton, Calif. As part of the District Court settlements and proposed ITC consent orders, each of the defendants has acknowledged the validity and infringement of at least 10 Epson patents and agreed to cease importing a wide range of infringing cartridges for Epson desktop inkjet printers.

Three additional companies agreed to consent orders in the ITC case that commit them to cease all U.S. imports of the accused cartridges for Epson desktop inkjet printers. The companies that agreed to consent orders that will be submitted to the ITC for approval include one major manufacturer and two U.S. distributors of aftermarket cartridges for Epson inkjet printers: Master Ink Co. Ltd. of Hong Kong, Ribbon Tree (USA) Inc. dba Cana-Pacific Ribbons Inc. of Ferndale, Wash., and Apex Distributing Inc. also of Ferndale, Wash. These ITC consent orders do not resolve the U.S. District Court cases pending in Portland against these companies.

In addition to the settlements and consent orders, the ITC judge ordered default judgments against eight companies named in the ITC action that failed to file responses within the required time limits. The defaulting companies are: AcuJet U.S.A., Inc. of Industry, Calif., Butterfly Print Image Corp. Ltd. of Hong Kong, Glory South Software Manufacturing Inc. of Buena Park, Calif., Mipo International Ltd. of Hong Kong, Mipo America Inc. of Miami, Tully Imaging Supplies Ltd. of Hong Kong, Wellink Trading Company Ltd. of Macao, and Ribbon Tree Trading Co. Ltd. of Macao. Some of these companies have also defaulted in the related U.S. District Court case in Portland.

The respondents that settled, entered consent orders or defaulted have collectively imported large volumes aftermarket cartridge components and finished cartridges into the United States for distribution through all channels where aftermarket cartridges are commonly sold including: office supply superstores, consumer electronic stores, computer specialty stores, catalog resellers, refill franchisees, internet resellers and re-export channels. The respondents’ cartridges were distributed primarily in a wide range of unbranded packaging but also under many different brand names belonging to the respondents or their customers including: AcuJet, Amazon Imaging, Basix, ColorJet, Inkees, InkTec, Mipo, Nikko, RhinoTek and Staples.

Trial in the ITC action against the few remaining respondents is scheduled for January 2007 in Washington D.C. before the Honorable Paul Luckern. Epson seeks a general exclusion order in the ITC action barring all imports of infringing cartridges by the respondents and all other importers. The U.S. District Court case is stayed against the defendants until resolution of the ITC case. Epson seeks a permanent injunction and treble damages for willful infringement in the District Court case.

"We commend the settling defendants for taking such decisive action to respect Epson’s patents and compete fairly," said Keith Kratzberg, vice president of Marketing, Epson America. "We will continue to pursue the ITC action and the pending District Court lawsuit vigorously and take whatever other action may be necessary to protect Epson from unfair competition through patent infringement or the distribution of counterfeit ink cartridges."

Related Post